In my last post, I first congratulated one of my loyal blog readers, Christina Berry, on the sale of her first novel. I invited her to leave a comment here if she wanted to share details (since I wasn’t quite sure how far along in the process the sale was). Christina left this comment:
I’m the not-so-mysterious “CB” and was thrilled to finally spill the beans about Moody contracting Undiscovered. It’s been a contract more than a month in the making, and remaining quiet ranks right up there with waterboarding for me.
I’ll be blogging about the particulars for the next week or so, but Moody was not the first house to say they had an offer on the way. However, they were the first to actually submit one to my agent and to negotiate a few tiny things. I will also be sharing something I asked my agent to do that will shock a few people.
I could go on and on, so I’ll close with a few intriguing notes: the title has already been changed–before the contract was signed, the slated release date is Sept. ‘09, and Randy’s statement of support was one of the most meaningful ones I read today!
Randy sez: You can read more details on Christina’s blog at AshBerryLane.net. Christina also has some projects she’s working on with her mother, Sherrie Ashcraft–hence the “AshBerry Lane” URL.
I note that Christina and Sherrie have a link to a recent novel, Tuesday Night At The Blue Moon, by Debbie Fuller Thomas. I had the fun of mentoring Debbie a few years ago in a mentoring clinic at a writing conference, and I immediately introduced her to a couple of agents because I knew she was going to be something special. Her writing is terrific.
Getting back to our last post, we had a look at a segment of writing posted by Lynda. I challenged my loyal blog readers to critique the segment first, because I think it’s a good exercise for you all. I know it’s good exercise for me, and I most always learn something when I critique something here.
To review, here is Lynda’s submission:
Rumbles roused Alejandro to half-consciousness. Overhead a succession of sky shattering cracks increased in intensity, each answered by waning reverberations. Something cold splattered against the back of his neck. His eyes flew open, and he stared into dank soil that emitted the moldy stink of decaying leaves. More droplets struck his neck, bled down, and seeped into the depression that cradled his face. He gathered his strength and rolled onto his back.
Excruciating pain shot through his arm. He screamed, clutched a wound, and writhed. The agony decreased by degrees to a fiery throb that radiated into his shoulder. He wiped his eyes and stared into the underside of a shrub that dripped with moisture.
Where was he? He reached up and parted some twigs. The jungle?
The forest around him steamed, producing an earthy cloud. Its heaviness hindered his breath and dimmed the light.
It would storm soon. He had to find shelter. Tangles of Passion Vines reached the forest floor. He grabbed a fist full, hoisted himself to a sitting position, and scanned the area. No outcrops. No hollow logs. His gaze went to a Giant Kapok that towered above adjacent trees. It would have to do. With his good arm, he dragged himself over the thickly mulched ground and hid amid the tree’s buttress folds. The jungle exploded with light. A crash followed. Then like the opening of a spillway, a torrent poured through the rainforest canopy.
He rested his head against the bryophyte encrusted bark. What happened? He’d been in his office at the university. How did he get here? And, what happened to his arm? Through the deluge, he studied the wind ravaged surroundings. Nothing seemed familiar. His temples pulsed with concentration. There had been soldiers. Running. Rifle fire. Pain. Terrible pain. He closed his eyes. The nursery appeared on the inside of his eyelids. And, the bloody bodies of Elena and their baby. Anguish crushed his heart, dwarfing the pain in his arm. His fault. Everything was his fault. He grabbed his face and sobbed, “Perdóname, Señor, Perdóname.”
Here is my analysis of the passage:
First, I think the setting is strong, the descriptions are vivid, and we have a character in some danger. It’s hard to tell just how much danger, because the real danger is experienced as backstory. We don’t know for certain whether Alejandro is now still in danger, though it seems very likely. However, the current story feels a bit out of focus. I don’t quite know what Alejandro wants right now, other than that he would presumably like to rewind the clock to before the soldiers came. Presumably, that goal will become clear shortly, so we won’t worry too much about it here.
Second, if this is the very beginning of the story, then I would suggest that a stronger beginning might be just before the soldiers arrived at his office at the university. Then we could live that bit in real-time, rather than seeing it in narrative summary here as backstory. But it may be that in Lynda’s novel, she’s already shown that. Lynda, can you comment on that?
A number of you made guesses at the number of Motivations and Reactions in this passage. Most of your guesses were different, and they ranged from 5+5 to 13+13. My own best guess is 8 Motivations and 8 Reactions, but I’m not really certain.
I think that my feeling of fuzziness in this passage is due to the lack of clarity in the MRUs. Here is how I broke out the Motivations and Reactions:
Paragraph 1: 3 M + 3 R
Paragraph 2: 2 M + 2 R
Paragraph 3: Continuation of the last R from previous paragraph
Paragraph 4: 1 M
Paragraph 5: 2 M + 2 R
Paragraph 6: 1 R
Might I suggest that the passage should be shuffled around a little to combine some of the one-sentence Motivations into larger units and some of the one-sentence Reactions into larger units? Also, I would recommend that the Motivations and Reactions be broken out into their own paragraphs.
Here is what I have in mind, in which I change almost no words but just shuffle things around a bit and delete a couple of sentences near the end. The first paragraph is a single sentence, part Motivation and part Reaction. But all other paragraphs are either all Motivation or all Reaction. It is now easy to count 7 Motivations and 7 Reactions (counting one of each in that first paragraph):
Rumbles roused Alejandro to half-consciousness.
Overhead a succession of sky shattering cracks increased in intensity, each answered by waning reverberations. Something cold splattered against the back of his neck. More droplets struck his neck, bled down, and seeped into the depression that cradled his face.
His eyes flew open, and he stared into dank soil that emitted the moldy stink of decaying leaves. He gathered his strength and rolled onto his back.
Excruciating pain shot through his arm.
He screamed, clutched a wound, and writhed.
The agony decreased by degrees to a fiery throb that radiated into his shoulder.
He wiped his eyes and stared into the underside of a shrub that dripped with moisture. Where was he? He reached up and parted some twigs. The jungle?
The forest around him steamed, producing an earthy cloud. Its heaviness hindered his breath and dimmed the light. Tangles of Passion Vines reached the forest floor.
It would storm soon. He had to find shelter. He grabbed a fist full of the vines, hoisted himself to a sitting position, and scanned the area.
No outcrops. No hollow logs. A Giant Kapok towered above adjacent trees.
It would have to do. With his good arm, he dragged himself over the thickly mulched ground and hid amid the tree’s buttress folds.
The jungle exploded with light. A crash followed. Then like the opening of a spillway, a torrent poured through the rainforest canopy.
He rested his head against the bryophyte encrusted bark. What happened? He’d been in his office at the university. How did he get here? And, what happened to his arm?
His temples pulsed with concentration. There had been soldiers. Running. Rifle fire. Pain. Terrible pain. He closed his eyes. The nursery appeared on the inside of his eyelids. And, the bloody bodies of Elena and their baby. Anguish crushed his heart, dwarfing the pain in his arm. His fault. Everything was his fault. He grabbed his face and sobbed, “Perdóname, Señor, Perdóname.”
What do you think? Is it clearer? Does the scene feel a little more focused?
Let me be clear that there is never just one right answer in writing fiction. There are a million good answers and a thousand extraordinary ones. So I am always cautious about changing a writer’s words or style. I prefer to just buff up a writer’s work so their individuality remains. It would be a dull world if everyone wrote like me — or like anyone else for that matter.
Daniel Smith says
I think we all had trouble critiquing this one. No offense intended, Lynda. It really is a gripping bit of writing and I enjoyed reading, re-reading, and puzzling over it!
I think two commenters said that this should be broken up into separate paragraphs based on the MRUs. I haven’t read Swain yet (it’s in my Amazon wish list for a Christmas present) but is this a hard and fast rule? Most of what everyone submitted including my own was not so strict. So, is this more of a rule or more of a guideline?
Kudos again, Christina!
Adam Heine says
I was thinking the same thing as Daniel, actually. Although Randy’s version here is definitely better, I think following the MRU paragraph break rules this strictly leaves it with too many paragraphs. The paragraph breaks cease to mean anything.
I admit that breaking paragraphs by MRUs usually does improve a piece, but I don’t think it always works.
On the other hand, maybe if I followed the rule strictly myself I’d be published already 😉
Sheila Deeth says
I always used to stay away from critiquing, but I enjoyed reading this. All the lessons on MRUs are certainly helping in my writing. Maybe I’ll try to pass them on to our little writers’ group next time I have to lead.
Lynda says
Thank you, Randy. I shall analyze your critique carefully. And, thank you everyone who submitted comments. They too are helpful.
The passage is the beginning of the second chapter. The first chapter opens with Alejandro in his office watching a massive blood bath in the streets below for which he is partially to blame. He is informed that soldiers are coming for him. He runs, but goes home first where he finds the bodies of his whole household.
When his head clears more, he will figure either the soldiers or a jaguar will get him. 🙂
Lynda says
Question. If you have a sentence that reads: A therefore B, does it count as a motivation followed by a reaction? Or should it be divided?
Lois says
Thanks, Randy, for making good writing appear clearer without changing anything! And thanks,Lynda for a good piece of writing.
The separation into shorter paragraphs reads so much faster. Yesterday I had the feeling the descriptions were excessive, but just the separation relieves that impression and makes good writing better.
Thanks to you both.
Kathryn says
Wow, a little bit of rearranging really made a difference!
I keep learning more with every crit!
Kristi Holl says
I have to say that I was really amazed how much difference it made to rearrange the sentences into more M-R sequencing. It really smoothed it out and made it more clear.
Kristi Holl
Writer’s First Aid blog
Hannah L. says
I have a question. Is it ever okay to start a scene with a reaction? Something sort of like this:
“Ow!” Ava glared and rubbed her arm. “Cole Travis, I know that was you!” She shook her head. Just like Cole to slam you with a dirt clod when you weren’t looking.
Ava is the POV character, but her reaction comes first. I’d love some help with this one. It seems like otherwise, I’d be using a lot of onomatopoeia in my scene beginnings:
Thwack! Ava flinched as a lone dirt clod slammed into her shoulder.
Onomatopoeia is good sometimes, but I’ve found that it can sound a little silly if you don’t have the right word for the noise–and I think if one uses it a lot, it can get old pretty fast.
Thanks,
Hannah L.
Thanks,
Hannah L.
Hannah L. says
Oops! I signed my name twice. Sorry!
Hannah L.
E. says
If we have a previous chapter establishing that he saw his dead household, I think you could be more subtle here. *We* needed to hear things like “the bloody bodies of Elena and their baby,” since otherwise we wouldn’t have any idea what’s gone on here, but your readers will already know.
So I think it might be better to refer to it more obliquely — kind of capturing what his mind might be doing at that time, which is being so utterly aware of what’s happened that he tries to block it out to minimally function. Try referring to the nursery without the bodies, for example, and see how it reads. Or even a flash of a memory of the *live* Elena and the baby (something specific, like remembering something Elena had said two days ago?).
Sherri says
Hannah, for what it’s worth… it’s a wonderful way to start off. I think the most important part is that the reaction is well constructed in your paragraph. You have the reflex first, followed by the rational action and speach. Well done.
Hannah L. says
Sherri,
Thank you! It isn’t actually anything I’m writing at the moment–I just made it up on the spot to illustrate my question. I hope it’s a good reflection of my WIP writing! I appreciate your opinion. I’d love to hear what anyone else has to say…
Grateful,
Hannah