We’ve been discussing those pesky Motivation-Reaction Units (MRUs) lately and on Monday I opened up the blog for submissions of short passages from your works in progress. Tuesday was my day to write my e-zine, so today I’m picking up where we left off on Monday.
Camille was the first to post an entry. I’ll insert comments after each Motivation and each Reaction:
Maggie just stood there in the cottage doorway chewing her lip, empty-handed this time except for the old scarred shovel handle she used as a walking stick.
Randy sez: This is a Motivation, since the POV character in this scene is Iain. Camille has shown us Maggie very well. We can see her standing there, not doing much (except chewing her lip). But that’s enough.
Iain frowned. “What do you mean she’s gone? Who’s gone?”
Randy sez: This is a Reaction. Iain is the POV character. A Reaction can have three parts, a Feeling, a Reflexive action, and a Rational action, but it doesn’t have to have them all. In this case, Iain’s Reaction has only the Rational action, in two parts. First he frowns. Then he speaks. A Reaction like this is just fine for dialogue.
She stomped her foot. “Och! Are ye deaf now, laddie? The lass. The one that writes ye letters.”
Randy sez: This is a new Motivation. We can see that stomping foot, can’t we? We can hear the irritation in her voice. (Is Maggie jealous of the lass?–we wonder. If she is, we suspect Iain doesn’t realize it, but we don’t know, so we read on.)
She knows about the letters . . . ?
Wait—Emily’s gone?
The burst of adrenaline that shot through his veins sent his voice booming. “What do you mean ‘gone’? Since when?” He pushed past Maggie and rushed down the walk, trying to ignore the uneasy tingle creeping up his spine.
Randy sez: The first two paragraphs are italicised because they are direct thoughts inside Iain’s head. This sequence had me a little confused when I read it the first time through. When I sat down to analyze it, I realized why. We have three paragraphs here, all three of which are part of Iain’s Reaction. But they are out of sequence. A burst of adrenaline is a BURST. It’s a Feeling, and Feelings happen quicker than any Rational thought.
So I would recommend showing the reader that burst of adrenaline first. Then show the Rational thought. Then show Iain speaking. It’ll feel more natural to the reader. Something like this:
A burst of adrenaline shot through Iain’s veins. Maggie knew about the letters. And . . . Emily was gone. “What do you mean, ‘gone?'” His voice boomed out louder than he’d intended. “Since when?” He pushed past Maggie and rushed down the walk, trying to ignore the uneasy tingle creeping up his spine.
“Grace woke up wanting to see her, but the lass wasnae there,” Maggie said from behind him. “We looked everywhere. We waited and waited, but she’s still not come round.”
Randy sez: This is a third Motivation, and it does its job nicely.
Rain smacked his face as he sprinted to the middle of the drive where he could get a better glimpse of the house. The old truck was there, next to the house in the same spot where Emily had parked it after church. He turned to Maggie, who had followed him out and stood without flinching at the steady rain matting down her stiff, white hair, her hands clutched together into a tight, knobby clump.
Randy sez: This is a third Reaction. I am wary of the word “as” because it often is used to put an Effect before a Cause. In the real world, Causes come first, then effects. Bombs explode, then people feel the blast.
If you think about what’s happening here, you’ll see that the Effect is coming before the Cause here. Iain is sprinting–that’s the Cause. Rain is smacking his face–that’s the Effect. You’ll also notice if you look hard that there is a Reaction, a Motivation, and a Reaction in this paragraph. Breaking them into separate paragraphs will pick up the pace a little, by adding white space to the page. I’d suggest something like this:
Iain sprinted toward the middle of the drive, ignoring the rain smacking his face.
The old truck was still there, next to the house in the same spot where Emily had parked it after church.
He turned to Maggie, who had followed him out and stood without flinching at the steady rain matting down her stiff, white hair, her hands clutched together into a tight, knobby clump.
Camille’s original piece was already pretty darn good. I’ve not messed with it much–just rearranged things a little to get things in a slightly better order. Why? To give the reader the best reading experience possible–so that at every point, the reader is there, inside the skin of the POV character, seeing what he sees, hearing what he hears, and most importantly, feeling what he feels.
Your goal as a novelist is to give your reader a Powerful Emotional Experience. That’s all. Nothing more. But never, ever, ever anything less.
Daan Van der Merwe says
Cool stuff! Waytogo Camille.
Pam Halter says
For some, strange reason, this example helped me more than the others.
My interest is piqued, Camille! 🙂
Parker Haynes says
I have to agree with you, Pam. Randy’s analysis of Camille’s snippet sheds a bit more light on the mystery of the magic MRU.
Congrats, Camille. When do we get to read more?
Lynda says
Randy, Can we use “as” when two actions are mutually exclusive? Example: He placidly read the paper as the children dismanteled the house.
Sam says
Lynda, you’re writing a book about my life? (just kidding)
Camille, great job! The details were fantastic.
Lynn Squire says
Wow, this example was really helpful. I went back over my own piece and picked out a couple of things I could change.
And as to the word ‘as’, I knew this already, but had a critiquer (I think it was in a contest) tell me to use it as a way to vary sentence structures. Your comment was great. While I still need to vary sentence structure, I’ll take your warning about ‘as’ with me as I write.
Camille says
Whew, thanks! I see it, now that you point it out. It felt awkward, but I didn’t know why. Hmm, now . . . back to check the other 270½ pages for more of the same.
And Effect before Cause . . . good grief! I hadn’t paid attention to that goof. I’m so glad you sat down and analyzed this. I used the ‘replace’ feature — I’d used the word “ as ” nearly 400 times. Sheesh. I wish that tool could find all the flipped Cause & Effects for me. (Grammar options can be set to flag writing goofs like clichés, passive sentences awkward phrases, but not that!)
I think I slipped into the habit of sticking effects at the beginning of a sentence to avoid starting with He, She, etc. Bad dog. Bad, bad dog.
Cause before Effect from now on! We can’t have people ducking for cover before the helicopter blows. This really helps. Thank you, Randy.
Sharon says
WOW! Somehow, I got this far in life without MRUs and now I see their absence/misuse everywhere. Thanks so much, Randy, for analyzing Diane and Camille’s snippets. This has been tremendously illuminating for me and I can’t believe my good luck at bumbling onto this blog!
Sheila Deeth says
Wow. That was a really informative example. I feel like I’m understanding MRUs much better now. Thanks.
Amy VR says
Holy Cannoli! I think I FINALLY get it! I don’t know what it was about this critique and expalnation but I had a lightbulb moment here. That’s the good news. The bad news… now I see how much reworking I need to do on my current draft.
Lois Hudson says
No, no, Camille. not bad dog.
Good dog – as in learning new tricks!
I agree that this is one of the best exercises we’ve studied. Seeing MRUs (or not) in real writing makes it so much easier to recognize them in our own writing.
Thanks, Randy, et al.